Publications Registry

Publications and Source Records

This page collects public whitepapers, compendia, source documents, and review packets connected to the DFT / GILC research spine.

Publications and Source Records

This registry collects public whitepapers, compendia, review packets, and source records connected to the DFT / GILC research spine.

A record here provides provenance and citation context. It does not automatically imply peer review, endorsement, certification, external validation, or scientific acceptance.

Each item should be read through its status, source family, URL completeness, and validation boundary.

Publication status

Provenance is not validation

This table classifies public documents by their current role in the research corpus. A public record, archive, DOI, or whitepaper provides traceability; it does not automatically imply peer review, endorsement, certification, or scientific acceptance.

Document	Status	Use	Boundary
Digital Fabrica Theory Whitepaper	Whitepaper draft	Primary theory and architecture source for DFT terminology, stack structure, and formalization targets.	Authorial whitepaper. Do not treat as peer-reviewed validation or certified production standard.
Digital Fabrica Theory: A Foundational Science of Infinite Digital Systems	Source document	Deep source material for theory language, mathematical ambitions, applied systems, and ecosystem framing.	High-risk source. Extract definitions and architecture only after claim-boundary review.
GILC Whitepaper v3.0	Institutional draft	Institutional source for scroll architecture, CodexStation, validator governance, semantic infrastructure, and public-benefit framing.	Institutional draft. Do not imply state accreditation, external approval, or peer validation unless separately documented.
New Millennium Frontier Whitepaper	Whitepaper draft	Source for frontier-science coordination, scroll verification, validator review, challenge registry, and milestone incentives.	Coordination framework. Does not replace academia, journals, prize institutions, or independent peer review.
The Science of Fabric Reality Brief	Public compendium	Integrative map of Ivan Pasev’s fabric-reality, invariance, recursion, DFT, FQFT, and systems-theory program.	Compendium and orientation document. Not universal acceptance or peer validation.
UKC:PHYSICA Overview	Source document	Physics-facing context for observables, transformations, invariants, scale discipline, falsifiability, and extension quarantine.	Research context. DFT/FQFT/KP/TFR extensions remain proposed unless independently formalized and reviewed.

Publication status: The documents listed here are primary sources, authorial frameworks, and institutional drafts. They are not peer reviewed academic publications unless explicitly linked to an external journal or verified repository.

Publication Status Classes

Status	Meaning
Authorial framework	Written source by Ivan Pasev / DFT corpus
Formalization target	Requires explicit formal proof or mechanized verification
Research extension	Theoretical extension requiring external validation
Applied architecture	System design / implementation architecture
External review needed	Should not be treated as validated until reviewed
Public provenance	Public identity/source route, not proof

Core Source Registry

Document	Type	Current Public Status
DFT Whitepaper	Architecture Specification	Authorial framework
Science of Fabric Reality Brief	Research Overview	Authorial framework
Yellow Chain Whitepaper	Applied Design	Institutional draft
GILC Whitepaper	Applied Architecture	Institutional draft
NMF Whitepaper	Coordination Model	Institutional research coordination model
UKC:PHYSICA	Discipline Reference	Research discipline layer
ISF / IDST	Formalization Document	Formalization target

Authorial Frameworks

Digital Fabrica Theory Whitepaper 2026

Authorial Framework

Type: Technical / theoretical whitepaper

Version: 1.0 · 2026-02-15

Status: Authorial framework

Review state: External review needed

Primary use: architecture source route

Boundary: Strong claims about proof, security, valuation, patent status, compliance, deployment, or peer review require independent documentation.

Core Specification

Science of Fabric Reality Brief

Authorial Framework

The comprehensive overview mapping the relationships between reality structures, recursive fields, invariants, and the broader DFT research program.

Research Compendium

Institutional Drafts

Yellow Chain Whitepaper

Draft

Applied network architecture detailing invariant block creation, zero-knowledge verification routing, and the economic incentive layer.

GILC Whitepaper

Draft

Design specifications for scroll processing, kernel integrity, validator networks, and the CodexStation deployment model.

NMF Whitepaper

Model

Institutional proposal for the New Millennium Frontier coordination framework, challenge registries, and verification protocols.

Research Manuscripts & Targets

FQFT / TFR / Realica Materials

Research Extension

Frontier explorations into recursive field stabilization, topological fabrics, and observer coherence. These documents represent theoretical extensions and remain under active development.

Falsifiable predictions in development

Riemann Hypothesis / Millennium Proof Programs

External Review Needed

Authorial mathematical manuscripts, proof programs, and formalization targets exploring structural solutions to Millennium-scale problems.

Not presented as externally accepted solutions

ISF / IDST Formalization

Formalization Target

The Infinite Stabilization Formula and Infinite Digital Structure Theorem presented as targets for rigorous specification, machine verification, or formalized proof frameworks.

Citation and Metrics Policy

Digital Fabrica applies strict metadata hardening to its publications registry:

No Unverified Impact Metrics: Fictional, unverified, or self-reported citation counts and impact factors are not displayed.
Explicit Review Status: Every document carries a specific review-state label (e.g., Authorial framework, Institutional draft, External review needed).
Independent Verification Required: Claims of external acceptance, formal verification, or field consensus are not made unless backed by independent, documented citations from recognized institutions.

Related Architecture

Review Discipline

Publications Review Path

These review tracks identify what would strengthen, weaken, or revise DFT claims. They are designed to make the framework testable, challengeable, and externally reviewable.

External expert neededcryptography

Post-Quantum Alignment Review

Are DFT security claims limited to post-quantum-aligned architecture, or do they imply unverified cryptographic certification?

Would Strengthen

Specific algorithm choices
Threat model
Key management model
Independent cryptographic review

Would Weaken

Generic quantum-secure wording
No algorithm selection
No threat model
No implementation artifacts

Boundary: DFT may use post-quantum-aligned language only when implementation choices and review status are explicit.

Review neededeconomics-game-theory

Zeta-Indexed Economics Review

Can the zeta-indexed economic model be expressed as a simulation-bounded mechanism without implying financial validity or investment return?

Would Strengthen

Explicit economic variables
Convergence proof where used
Agent-based simulation
Legal review for token/financial implications

Would Weaken

Valuation claims without methodology
Investment language
Unbounded token-stability claims
No simulation

Boundary: This is a research extension and must not be represented as financial advice, offering, or validated macroeconomic result.

External References

Publications Reference Graph

This graph shows external mathematical, scientific, and technical references used to orient DFT concepts. A reference supports the background or analogy; it does not validate DFT-specific claims by itself.

historical foundationnumber-theory

On the Number of Primes Less Than a Given Magnitude

Bernhard Riemann · 1859

zeta-function background
Euler-product relation context
zeta-indexed economic model inspiration

Boundary: Historical mathematical foundation. DFT economic use is a research extension, not a validated financial mechanism.

standard or guidelinestandards

Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization

National Institute of Standards and Technology

post-quantum security context
cryptographic review path
security boundary language

Boundary: Public standardization context. DFT may be described as post-quantum-aligned only where implementation choices are specified; certification is not implied.

Citation Boundary: External references are used to orient the mathematical, scientific, or technical background of DFT. They do not imply endorsement, peer-review acceptance of DFT, certification, deployment validation, or proof completion. DFT-specific claims remain authorial, formalization-target, implementation-candidate, or external-review-needed unless independently documented.

Source Discipline

Publications Source Route

These source routes show which documents or media support this page and how their claims should be interpreted publicly.

authorial frameworkwhitepaper

Digital Fabrica Theory Whitepaper 2026

DFT definition
ISF and PI-DST formalization targets
DFDF / FNS / IDFF / SIDS architecture stack
runtime gates G1-G10
Ethics Kernel

Boundary: Authorial DFT source document. Claims about proof, deployment, valuation, security, compliance, or peer review require independent documentation before being treated as validated.

public provenancewebsite

GILC Institutional Context

institutional context
formalization pathway
logic and cybernetics framing

Boundary: Institutional/public context route. Not proof of external scientific acceptance.