DFT Review Discipline

Review and Falsifiability Path

This page defines how Digital Fabrica Theory can be evaluated, challenged, strengthened, weakened, or revised. It is a public review matrix, not a claim of completed peer review.

Review Boundary

Digital Fabrica Theory is presented as an authorial framework and formalization program. Public review tracks identify what must be formalized, simulated, implemented, or independently reviewed before stronger claims can be made. The presence of a review path does not mean peer review has been completed.

Review TrackStatusReview QuestionRequired EvidenceBoundary

ISF / Well-Founded Stabilization Review

mathematical-logic

Formalization neededCan the ISF stabilization claim be reduced to a precise well-founded transition theorem with explicit state space, rank function, and fixed-point semantics?
  • Formal statement
  • Assumption list
  • Lemma dependency graph
  • Mechanized proof skeleton
  • External review notes
This review track evaluates a formalization target, not a completed theorem.

Spectral Expansion / Ramanujan Routing Review

graph-theory

Simulation neededWhich DFT routing, robustness, or partition-resilience claims follow from expander graph properties, and which require separate empirical simulation?
  • Graph model
  • Failure simulation
  • Routing-depth metrics
  • Partition-resilience report
External graph theory supports topology design; DFT-specific network claims require modeled evidence.

Post-Quantum Alignment Review

cryptography

External expert neededAre DFT security claims limited to post-quantum-aligned architecture, or do they imply unverified cryptographic certification?
  • Threat model
  • Cryptographic primitive list
  • Security assumptions
  • Implementation audit
  • External reviewer notes
DFT may use post-quantum-aligned language only when implementation choices and review status are explicit.

Applied Fabric Readiness Review

systems-architecture

Implementation evidence neededDo applied fabrics have enough interface, evidence, and implementation detail to move from architecture candidate to prototype candidate?
  • Architecture spec
  • Interface map
  • Evidence schema
  • Security checklist
  • Pilot readiness checklist
Applied fabrics remain architecture candidates until implementation evidence and external review exist.

Zeta-Indexed Economics Review

economics-game-theory

Review neededCan the zeta-indexed economic model be expressed as a simulation-bounded mechanism without implying financial validity or investment return?
  • Mechanism definition
  • Simulation parameters
  • Stress test
  • Legal/economic review
This is a research extension and must not be represented as financial advice, offering, or validated macroeconomic result.

Claim Challenge Protocol

Identify the exact claim and page route.
Classify the claim: mathematical, architectural, security, economic, legal, or implementation.
List assumptions and missing definitions.
State what evidence would strengthen or falsify the claim.
Route to formalization, simulation, implementation, or external review.
Revise public wording if evidence is insufficient.

Claim-Level Source Trace

Review Claim Trace

Major claims on this page are mapped to source routes, bibliography records, formalization targets, review records, and public boundaries.

Review and Falsifiability Path

DFT exposes review tracks that specify what would strengthen, weaken, or revise major claims.

Sources: dft-whitepaper-2026
Bibliography: godel-incompleteness-1931
Formalization: isf-ordinal-stabilization
Review: isf-well-foundedness-review, spectral-routing-review, post-quantum-security-review, zeta-economics-review

Boundary: Review path only. Does not imply peer review has been completed.