Review and Falsifiability Path
DFT exposes review tracks that specify what would strengthen, weaken, or revise major claims.
Boundary: Review path only. Does not imply peer review has been completed.
DFT Review Discipline
This page defines how Digital Fabrica Theory can be evaluated, challenged, strengthened, weakened, or revised. It is a public review matrix, not a claim of completed peer review.
Digital Fabrica Theory is presented as an authorial framework and formalization program. Public review tracks identify what must be formalized, simulated, implemented, or independently reviewed before stronger claims can be made. The presence of a review path does not mean peer review has been completed.
| Review Track | Status | Review Question | Required Evidence | Boundary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ISF / Well-Founded Stabilization Review mathematical-logic | Formalization needed | Can the ISF stabilization claim be reduced to a precise well-founded transition theorem with explicit state space, rank function, and fixed-point semantics? |
| This review track evaluates a formalization target, not a completed theorem. |
Spectral Expansion / Ramanujan Routing Review graph-theory | Simulation needed | Which DFT routing, robustness, or partition-resilience claims follow from expander graph properties, and which require separate empirical simulation? |
| External graph theory supports topology design; DFT-specific network claims require modeled evidence. |
Post-Quantum Alignment Review cryptography | External expert needed | Are DFT security claims limited to post-quantum-aligned architecture, or do they imply unverified cryptographic certification? |
| DFT may use post-quantum-aligned language only when implementation choices and review status are explicit. |
Applied Fabric Readiness Review systems-architecture | Implementation evidence needed | Do applied fabrics have enough interface, evidence, and implementation detail to move from architecture candidate to prototype candidate? |
| Applied fabrics remain architecture candidates until implementation evidence and external review exist. |
Zeta-Indexed Economics Review economics-game-theory | Review needed | Can the zeta-indexed economic model be expressed as a simulation-bounded mechanism without implying financial validity or investment return? |
| This is a research extension and must not be represented as financial advice, offering, or validated macroeconomic result. |
Claim-Level Source Trace
Major claims on this page are mapped to source routes, bibliography records, formalization targets, review records, and public boundaries.
DFT exposes review tracks that specify what would strengthen, weaken, or revise major claims.
Boundary: Review path only. Does not imply peer review has been completed.