Source Maintenance
Citation Health
Citation health tracks the public availability and maintenance status of source records.
It answers practical questions:
- Is there a canonical public URL?
- Is there a DOI?
- Is there an archive mirror?
- Is the source internal-only?
- Does the record need review?
Boundary: Citation health does not certify scientific validity, does not imply peer review, and does not replace external expert evaluation.
Citation Principle: References are maintained as provenance and intellectual context. A citation does not equate to external validation, peer review, or endorsement of DFT claims.
Status Legend
| Status | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Complete | Canonical URL and preservation route verified |
| Needs review | Metadata exists but requires confirmation |
| Missing DOI | Public source exists without verified DOI |
| Archive needed | Long-term archive route should be added |
| Internal source only | Used as context, not as external publication |
| Not public yet | Do not present as public publication |
DOI and Archive Plan
Core source records are being prepared for long-term preservation through canonical URLs, archive mirrors, and DOI records where appropriate.
This process is staged:
- finalize the public source artifact;
- verify authorship, version, license, and abstract;
- assign canonical route;
- upload to archive or DOI venue;
- update citation health and publications registry;
- preserve the validation boundary.
Boundary: A DOI or archive mirror improves provenance and preservation. It does not convert a source into peer-reviewed or externally validated science.
Citation health
URL, DOI, and archive status
Citation health tracks availability and maintenance. It does not certify scientific validity, peer review, or external validation.
| Record | Family | URL status | Public note | Boundary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital Fabrica Theory Whitepaper | DFT | Needs reviewThe source record exists, but public URL, DOI, archive, or status metadata still require review. | Primary DFT theory source. Canonical public URL, DOI, and archive status require final verification before being marked complete. | Whitepaper/source record. Public provenance does not imply peer review, certification, or external validation. |
| GILC Whitepaper v3.0 | GILC | Needs reviewThe source record exists, but public URL, DOI, archive, or status metadata still require review. | Institutional source record for scroll architecture, CodexStation, validator governance, and public-benefit knowledge infrastructure. | Institutional draft. Does not imply accreditation, government approval, or independent validation. |
| New Millennium Frontier Whitepaper | NMF | Needs reviewThe source record exists, but public URL, DOI, archive, or status metadata still require review. | Frontier-science coordination source. Canonical public URL and archive mirror require final verification. | Coordination framework. Does not replace academic peer review, universities, journals, or prize institutions. |
| The Science of Fabric Reality Brief | SFR | Needs reviewThe source record exists, but public URL, DOI, archive, or status metadata still require review. | Public compendium and orientation record for the broader fabric-reality research spine. | Compendium/orientation document. Not universal scientific acceptance or peer validation. |
| UKC:PHYSICA Overview | PHYSICA | Internal source onlyThe source is used internally for context and is not presented as an external publication. | Physics-facing internal research-context source used to discipline observables, transformations, invariants, scale boundaries, and falsifiability language. | Research context. DFT/FQFT/KP/TFR extensions remain proposed unless independently formalized and reviewed. |
| Reference ID | Status | Risk | Repair Action | Boundary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lps-ramanujan-graphs-1988 | publisher check needed | medium | Verify canonical URL/DOI from publisher or reliable archive, then update scientificBibliographyRegistry. | External reference supports graph-theory background only; it does not validate DFT routing/security claims. |
| riemann-zeta-1859 | archive needed | low | Add verified archive/library URL only after source check. | Historical mathematical reference; DFT economic interpretations remain research extensions. |
| nist-post-quantum-cryptography | verified | medium | Recheck official NIST source before major security-language updates. | PQC source does not certify DFT or any DFT implementation. |
| godel-incompleteness-1931 | archive needed | low | Locate and verify stable academic archive URL. | Foundation for logical limits; does not imply external proof of DFT. |
| turing-computable-numbers-1936 | archive needed | low | Locate and verify stable academic archive URL. | Historical logic reference; does not imply explicit certification of DFT execution model. |
| alexander-knot-invariants-1928 | archive needed | low | Locate and verify stable academic archive URL. | Theoretical reference. Does not validate active DFT governance encoding. |
| mandelbrot-fractal-geometry-1982 | unverified | medium | Verify valid ISBN/DOI locator and insert into registry. | Conceptual context; does not validate scaling performance. |
| nash-equilibrium-1950 | archive needed | low | Add verified archive/library URL only after source check. | Game theory context; does not certify market equilibrium of DFT applied fabrics. |
| industry-4-xu-2018 | publisher check needed | medium | Verify DOI link health periodically. | Contextual reference; does not serve as peer review for DFT systems. |
Reference Category Matrix
References are mapped into provenance context categories:
- Foundational mathematics
- Graph theory
- Logic / computation
- Cryptography
- Fractal / network science
- Governance / economics
- Industry / application context