Back to Registry

systems-architecture • Research extension

14-Dimensional Tensor Ontology

A 14D Tensor space representing ontological relationships in the DFT stack.

Assumptions

  • Dimensions are orthogonal.
  • Tensor ranks map to complexity tiers.

Proof Obligations

  • Define basis vectors for all 14 dimensions.
  • Prove completeness of representation.

14D conformance examples

Mapping applications and implementations into semantic bands

These examples test whether DFT applications and implementations can be classified through the 14D tensor ontology without turning semantic mapping into physical, legal, or operational validation.

applicationsource-bounded

YellowChain

Spatial band

Jurisdictional and organizational deployment contexts require explicit mapping.

Topological band

DID, governance, and resource-ledger relations can be modeled as graph relations.

Governance band

Policy, identity, and decision rules map naturally to governance bands.

Economic band

Circular economy and resource-ledger claims require evidence-state classification.

Cross-dimensional band

Cross-domain identity/governance/resource mappings remain review-needed.

Review gap

Needs canonical schema, DID model, and implementation evidence before stronger claims.

Boundary: This is a semantic conformance example, not proof of operational deployment.

applicationevidence-needed

Citizen.Solar

Spatial band

Energy sites, local communities, and civic participation contexts can be spatially classified.

Topological band

Energy, identity, and community-governance links can be graph-modeled.

Governance band

Citizen participation and identity claims require legal and operational boundaries.

Economic band

Energy-credit and ownership models require documented economics before public claims.

Cross-dimensional band

Energy/identity/governance bridges remain implementation-candidate mappings.

Review gap

Needs pilot data, legal model, and implementation architecture.

Boundary: This mapping is a review scaffold, not proof of energy system deployment.

implementationimplementation-candidate

Stitchia

Spatial band

Interface and product/workflow surfaces can be spatially organized.

Topological band

Textile/logical weave relations can be modeled as pattern graphs.

Governance band

Design ownership, provenance, and pattern licensing remain to be specified.

Economic band

Marketplace or product-economy claims require separate evidence.

Cross-dimensional band

Physical textile / digital fabric analogy remains bounded as implementation model.

Review gap

Needs user stories, data schema, and implementation demo evidence.

Boundary: This is an implementation mapping, not validation of the whole DFT architecture.

implementationevidence-needed

Global Freight Exchange

Spatial band

Freight lanes, nodes, ports, warehouses, and locations form spatial fabric components.

Topological band

Carrier, shipment, customs, and transaction relations form graph components.

Governance band

Compliance, customs, and dispute states require explicit governance modeling.

Economic band

Pricing, settlement, and incentive structures require measurable economic specification.

Cross-dimensional band

Physical logistics and digital evidence-layer binding remains review-needed.

Review gap

Needs operational workflow, data model, compliance evidence, and integration design.

Boundary: This is a conformance example, not evidence of live freight exchange operations.

Claim Boundary

Formalization target.